Q2. What themes does each version choose to highlight more and what effect does it have?
Answer 2: The British version seems to focus more on the textual implications and characterization- each character was distinct, and a bit exaggerated (the sentry) as in an actual play; I could easily remember how Creon was characterized as a demagogue: dominant, intimidating, and antagonistic (theme: threat of tyranny?). Themes of duty vs authority are present through Antigone’s conversation with Ismene, in which both characters have different attitudes (Antigone is more dominant and harsh with tone than Ismene, who seems scared), highlighting the contrast of opinions. There was less movement than speech, with close-ups to see facial expression during dialogue. This gives the effect that the conversation is very significant and serious (draws attention of viewer). Themes of tragedy are present as well, in which speeches are exaggerated (loud at specific words to emphasize importance), expressions are easy to recognize, and the timeline is very fast-paced (giving a feeling of urgency as the moments of tragedy come quickly- not allowing the viewer to absorb it all before moving on. Finally, sister rivalry between Ismene and Antigone is noticeable, through the sisters’ argument in which the sisters do not seem to relate to each/ share a strong bond as shown in the Greek version. While Antigone is portrayed as strong-minded, Ismene contrasts with a scared, mindful demeanor.
The Greek version demonstrates tragedy related themes through visual imagery of post-war rubble, dead
soldiers, the quick change of mood from celebratory to shocked (from Creon).
This gives the feeling of tension to audience, and empathy to the “victim”,
Antigone, even though it can be interpreted that there is more than one victim
in story.
Q3. Which version did you like the most and for what specific reasons?
Answer 3: I preferred the Greek version to the British
version due to the increased amount of visual focus in the movie. The Greek
version seemed more spread out in space and time, filming in more locations and
offering black-outs to signify a change in time, to make the story more
realistic than happening all at once like the British adaptation, which relates
more to a play-like scenario. The Greek version offered flashbacks to
specifically visualize how Antigone buried her brother, and to allow the
audience to actually see this brings forth more empathy to Antigone. The costumes
were more like those of ancient Greece (more drapes), increasing the credulity
to the film being set in ancient Greece. The acting was more subtle, like of a
film, to make it more realistic rather than in the British version where the
lines were filled with more expression, almost exaggerated like a play. The
British film seemed out of place with the irregular scenery (only situated in
Creon’s palace…) and costume (Creon’s costume looked like something from Star
Trek), along with the British accents and modern dialogue, where in the Greek
film, the fact that the lines are spoken in Greece brings in an air of authenticity
to the story. The British film didn’t have enough movement (seemed limited, one
dimensional), while the Greek film balanced between it and speech, creating a
harmony in which the audience can relate to with their own way of
thinking. Overall, I think the British
version tried too hard to create a movie as similar to the Ancient Greek
Ampitheatre plays, while also adding in elements of modern-day British culture
(accents, colloquial dialogue), but by doing this, the film seemed too awkward
and artificial. If this was to be a movie, then BBC should have integrated
elements of movie production to create a more natural viewing experience- to “work
with what you have”, rather than to elicit the true essence of Sophocles, since
no one can recreate Antigone better than Sophocles did himself.
1 comment:
Rosa,
You have raised some interesting points about adaptations and movie versions of plays. The BBC version was a filmed version of a play, so that is why it suited the play genre much more than the Greek movie version.
While the BBC version aimed to stay authentic to some elements of the play version, there were obvious interpretations which changed to focus or characterisation and space age costumes(!)
Plays are reinvented over the ages again and again. An important question might be, what is it about a play which makes producers and directors want to stage it?
If all play adaptations were precisely faithful to the original interpretation would they still be popular / understood by the audience?
Post a Comment