'notorious' characters explored in the four IOP texts

All the novels feature ‘notorious’ characters. Is it positive or negative? Explain for each character.

Notorious in our opinion is used to describe someone who is ill-famed and known widely and usually unfavourably. The person described usually has unfavourable connotations attached to them. They are also known for bad conduct or disgrace.

In 'Regeneration' by Pat Barker, our group agreed that Sassoon can be identified as a 'notorious' character because he rebels against the government through his written declaration. He is portrayed unfavourably in the governments' eyes and is ill-famed to some extent. Through his insurgent poems, he gained popularity amongst his fellow fascists, thus proving him to be viewed also as 'notorious' in a positive way.

Another character which can be portrayed as 'notorious' is the infamous Dr. Yealland who gained his reputation of notoriety throughout the hospital due to his horrific treatment methods in which he inflicts on his patients thus making him 'notorious' in the eyes of his patients.

In 'Perfume' by Patrick Süskind, the protagonist, Grenouille, murders young, attractive virgins to obtain their exotic scent. However, he is only established as a 'notorious' person at the end of the novel as he was finally convicted of his murders then. Before that, he managed to keep a low profile, through his undetected scent and so was able to keep his murders hidden from the public. Grenouille's secret identity as a murderer classifies him as a 'notorious' character amongst the readers even before he was uncovered in the public eyes for his crimes. His notoriety is seen as negative before and after the discovery of his actions.

In 'Alias Grace' by Margeret Atwood, Grace Marks, the protagonist is depicted as a 'notorious' character through her reputation for killing. In the novel, she is labeled as a "celebrated murderess" (page 25). Her notoriety is inflated through her responses during her trials. She is a cunning and clever woman, and is deemed 'notorious' by choosing to keep her deeper thoughts hidden from the authorities.

- Anahita, Lillian, Mai & Yung

The Narrative Voice: Novels in Part 4

Written by: Truc, Chris, Nick and Rhys

Comment on the narrative voice of each text. How does it allow the audience to connect with the protagonist?

ALIAS GRACE
More than one narrative voice is present in this novel. It switches between Grace's first hand account, which is at times both dreamlike and lucid, and a third-person account focused on Dr. simon Jordan's perspective. The story is also told through a series of letters, ranging in writers from Dr Jordan, his colleagues, his mother, and even Grace herself.
Grace's first hand account is not reliable - at times we feel intimate with her because she admits things to the reader that Dr Jordan is not able to get out of her. However, sometimes her accounts of events are hazy and lacking in focus/detail, creating more confusion amongst the various newspaper articles, song lyrics and "first hand" accounts of the time. The narrative of Dr Jordan seems distant, as the parts of it that revolve around Grace seem more analytical and inquisitive than empathetic. It makes Grace seem like an object instead of a person.

TRUE HISTORIES OF THE KELLY GANG
This novel is told primarily from Ned Kelly's point of view, in what appears to be a long letter to his unborn daughter it is seperated into 13 bound parcels, each concerned with a different aspect of his life.
Ned's accounts are told with little punctuation and sometimes read as a series of thoughts that just "pop" into his head. This makes the reader feel closer to him - as if we are truly within the complicated realm of his mind. Each parcel starts with librarian's notes and detailed explanations of the appearance of each parcel (size, type of paper, etc) it helps to bring Ned Kelly to life, as the addtion of the notes makes one really feel as if the letters he writes are real.

PERFUME
This is an omniscient narrative, focused mostly on Grenouille but at times shifting into side stories of other characters who are affected by Grenouille. The narrator switches between showing the audience what goes in in Grenouille's mind, and then showing the audience the consequences of his actions. For example, towards the end of the novel when he is murdering everyone, Suskind chooses to look at it through the perspective of the villagers, revealing what a monster Grenouille is. However, when the narrator chooses to show the perspectives of people like Baldini, who use Grenouille, the reader feels sympathy because these people do not treat Grenouille as if he is a person. The language used is highly descriptive and sensory, in terms of the setting and the smells and emotions Grenouille experiences, by doing this, Suskind manages to create some sort of feeling for Grenouille's decisions and horrible crimes because of the rich narrative language.

REGENERATION
This, again, is a third person omniscient narrative that presents more than one viewpoint. each soldier has his own story told at various points throughout the novel - allowing the audience to connect with each one individually, understanding every facet of the plight of the soldiers. As well as this, there are large amounts of narrative that, though in third person, are detailed accounts of Rivers' thought process. Through Rivers, all of the characters within the story are linked together - his analysis of their psyche and experiences and questions about the practice of psychiatry and the morals of war allow deeper feeling and empathy for each character's situation, and the situation of the "broken soldiers" as a whole.